Originally Posted by
Exoter175
The past is the most relevant thing you could possibly use towards predicting your stock, and I'm not specifically applying the "past" of ELTP specifically, but the "status quo" of pharma stocks making "big breakthroughs" or taking a "leap" at an important drug. Though, ELTP's past performance indicators paints a very fine and almost "true" indicator of what the stock will due. Partially because its a pump and dump, partially because its a pharma stock. If you'd actually listen to my advice, you'd make a fuck ton of money.
I have zero problems whatsoever with paying uncle sam $3,0xx from my $12,2xx.xx gain. You keep talking about capital gains taxes like its a bad thing, or that they are ludicrous and they really aren't. I'm starting to think you actually don't know the ins and outs of finances, actually I know you don't, but you assume something fierce sounding like "capital gains" means they take it out of your hide or something. You do know there's a counterpart to Capital gains, right? Its called Capital Loss, kind of works the same way. So thanks to your shitshow stock that I lost slightly less than 2 grand on, I got to deduct the loss from that exchange to counter the gain from my "attempt" at reading the market. All in all, taxes, fees, everything, I made over 12 grand on my exchange. How's yours going?
God you're so dense. First of all, you aren't going to hit 40% capital gain tax unless you're already bringing in the bookoo bucks at your day job, and if you're making enough for 40%, you don't need the stock market or APBJ, you just need a smart hedgefund manager, or to create a shell corporation to manage your private investments with a bit of a tax break.
Second of all, they wouldn't be receiving the funding that they have in the past 2 years without being recognized as an R&D firm, more than a generic manufacturer.
Third of all, do you not understand the market, at all? You do realize that there's a time of year where people stop investing, right? Do you know what time of year is prominent for investing and divesting? I'm practically spoonfeeding you answers to my own questions, testing your stock market knowledge, and all you ever do is sidestep the question with the obvious answer that you don't like because it disagrees with your mythical unicorn of a pump and ump stock. Last month you didn't see it dropping that low, now you're agreeing to .25 after I've been calling it for a while now? When it hits .25 this week, maybe next, are you going to agree it'll go to .20? And what happens when it hits .20 later in the year, will you agree that it will hit .15? And so forth?
Seriously dude, barring anything truly marvelous happening with a breakthrough, your pump and dump stock reads like a book. Do you want me to shoot you a memo later in the year on when to sell and invest? I'll just take a small % fee for reading the repeated stock volume and pricing of ELTP for the better part of a decade, which you apparently didn't do in your DD or you'd have sold out and bought in two, maybe three times by now.
Does Lincoln have confidence in Elite? No. But they have confidence in the fact that their loan will get paid back in full regardless of what happens to Elite based on the fact that the funding will go towards refreshing patents, of which Elite has too many and is going to continue to become overburdened with expenses on, and at this point won't truly grow on the market until they head a medical miracle of a breakthrough. And you better believe the the terms of that loan are extremely private and Elite had to put up Patent ownership and equity to attain it. At this point, Lincoln can't lose, they'll hold patent rights until paid back, essentially, and if they don't get paid back, own the rights and can sell it to pfizer for a nice little gain. Why wouldn't Lincoln give them the loan? lol.
Its almost like you know nothing of business, at all. How much equity do you think Elite has thats in that loan agreement anyways? Christ, Lincoln might be able to get a sizeable portion of their investment back based solely on the breakup value of a medical R&D facility lolololol.
Bookmarks