I do not want to open a separate topic, for this I will ask my questions here for Kakarulo. I'm interested in comparing several systems at different spreads. Let it be 6 decks, pen 4/ 6 , spread 1-20 and 1-50.
1. AO 2 vs Hi Opt 2.
2. EBJ 2 vs BRH 0.
My academic interest is this - at what spread would AO 2 outperform Hi Opt 2 due to its more powerful BC? And due to what BRH 0 outperforms EBJ 2?
https://www.blackjackinfo.com/commun...r-6deck.12920/
See post by BRH
He put BRH 0 higher than RPC.
Code:
Here are the answers to your questions:
Sims conditions: 6D-S17-DOA-DAS-SPA1-SPL3-NS, 4.5/6, R22 plays, 50 billion rounds each, play-all, heads-up.
1)
1-12 1-16 1-30 1-40
Hi-Opt II/A 25.53 29.74 36.91 39.34
Omega II/A 24.67 28.80 35.84 38.23
Hi-Opt II 21.89 25.68 32.15 34.33
Omega II 21.11 24.82 31.16 33.29
2)
1-12 1-16 1-30 1-40
BRH-0 22.77 26.79 33.71 36.07
EBJ-2 22.53 26.50 33.35 35.69
The problem with EBJ-2 is that it counts the nine. While this improves BC, on the other hand it decreases IC and PC/PE.
BRH-0
BC = 0.9799
IC = 0.7852
PC = 0.7774
EBJ-2
BC = 0.9854
IC = 0.7462
PC = 0.7713
About BRH systems
BRH-0 is actually Red-7 or Double Red-7 and can be played in both RC and TC modes.
In fact if you look at my CAC/71 system you will see that by doing (2*pc+sc) I am using DR7 in TC mode but ONLY for betting.
In EBJ-2 the idea was to increase BC by counting nines, but as I said before, this decreases IC and PC/PE.
BRH-I is HALVES but not counting nines. The same problem occurs here as with BRH-0 and EBJ-2 and that is why BRH-I outperforms HALVES.
BRH-II is ZEN with an side count of aces.
Enjoy!
Sincerely,
Cac
Bookmarks