You guys are going to confuse the crap out of yourselves. Put down the mouse Chester. Poor Ronster is going to busy a spring.
It seem like you already had experience or used the Gordon Count before otherwise I don't understand why you would say the Gordon Count is surrealistically powerful? Surrealistically meaning unreal. If not than how can you form a conclusion on something you haven't even used?
The so-called count provided BC = .95 *PE= .41 *IC = .53.
WHO in their right mind would scramble the E.O.R.'s of 9's, 10's and Aces
in such a bizarre fashion ~ unless they are trying to demonstrate the value
of understanding the E.O.R. of the (higher) ranks, by purposely creating a
truly dreadful count for comparison.
Note: BC < .985, P.E. < .560, and IC < .775 are all dreadful.
Last edited by ZenMaster_Flash; 12-19-2016 at 05:47 PM.
What about this count the 9's are counted as zeros:
A-(-3)
2- 1
3-2
4-2
5-3
6-2
7-1
8-0
9-0
T-(-2)
PE = .49
NOTE: the self-destructive P E created by tagging Aces as greater than 10's.
Aces need to be side-counted if you want to play BJ accurately and seriously.
Bookmarks