More Indices or Higher Level Count

[Freightman]

This is not as easy as you think. The software is limited. And, I had no idea what your "hints" were about.

Then out them, and let me deal with them.

[Norm]

You know, I'm really sick of ten different people telling me that the forum must be run in ten certain different ways. Just be nice.

[Norm]

Then out them, and let me deal with them.

That's against the rules. If that's a threat to someone, that's also against the rules.

[Freightman]

You know, I'm really sick of ten different people telling me that the forum must be run in ten certain different ways. Just be nice.

Being essentially told twice a day that I’m a fucking idiot limits my niceness.

[Freightman]

That's against the rules. If that's a threat to someone, that's also against the rules.

In a verbal sense only. I thought that was understood.

[Norm]

I have removed all of that user's ratings. That includes 175 negatives of your posts. You still have 330 negatives from other users.

[Freightman]

I have removed all of that user's ratings. That includes 175 negatives of your posts. You still have 330 negatives from other users.

Now, I can be nice again.

[beating vegas]

The only person capable of putting a stop this is the moderator.

Don

I take it as a compliment that you point out my horrible grammar.

[DSchles]

I take it as a compliment that you point out my horrible grammar.

Ha! Tried to sneak it in quietly without making a big deal of it.

Don

[BJGenius007]

Apparently many people on this site are disrespectful and have no manners.

They are perfectly normal with manners before you drove them crazy.

[bjanalyst]

This thread was supposed to be about more indices or higher level counts and I gave a third option of adding a side count.

Now the replies have nothing at all to do about what this thread was suppose to be about.

Things have been sidetracked to ridiculous discussions that have nothing to do with the initial purpose of this thread.

And I noticed this degradation has happened to other posts as well.

Readers really need to stick their discussions to the initial purpose of the post and not get side tracked.

[seriousplayer]

Higher level counts with less indices outperform level one counts with 100+ indices. Wong Halves with Catch 22 indices outperforms Hi-lo full with 100+ indices. Even using unbalanced counts UBZII with Catch 22 indices outperforms Hi-lo Full with 100+ indices. Don't believe do a simulation with CVCX and compare.

[Gramazeka]

Higher level counts with less indices outperform level one counts with 100+ indices. Wong Halves with Catch 22 indices outperforms Hi-lo full with 100+ indices. Even using unbalanced counts UBZII with Catch 22 indices outperforms Hi-lo Full with 100+ indices. Don't believe do a simulation with CVCX and compare.

Yes, but speed systems, hand/hour ? And universality? For example side count system vs balanced count system for ST ... Can you compare them ? Where will he stick Bjanalyst his chips with a fast dealer or when using tracking? Where will he play when pen 3/3 or 2/4 ?- And for me such conditions are delicious chocolate.