0 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
Did you find this post helpful?
Yes |
No
Originally Posted by
seriousplayer
I thought from several posts ago you promise to give up the claim that your system outperforms HI-OPT II ASC when the simulations show that it didn't. Stop saying that your system outperforms Hi-OPT II ASC when it doesn't.
Simulations show that for back counting (which is how you should be playing the shoe game anyhow) that my system does outperform the HO2 w ASC. If you are playing with negative counts than you have a bigger problem than trying to find the best system.
Also when LS is simulated you will see even a bigger difference with my KO system pulling even farther ahead than the HO2 w ASC.
And you also totally ignored the other 4 points I must mentioned in choosing a count system. The HO2 system is very difficul to keep and is subject to extreme errors in true count calculations from errors in estimating decks played. So whatever theoretical advantage that the sims show for the HO2 w ASC you lose when put into practical play.
With the KO the true counts are extremely accurate around the true count pivot for a true count of 4 which is where you want accuracy and the XmYc side count is EXACT.
So stop just dwelling on power as reflected by the sims. Consider all five points in choosing a count system. And anyhow, my KO system does outperform the HO2 w ASC unless you are stupid enough to play in all negative counts.
Bookmarks