More Indices or Higher Level Count

[bjanalyst]

Yes, for the exact reasons I stated. You are dropping the more difficult count when it is easier to use, and forcing a mind switch between two counts in the same shoe, increasing errors and difficulty while decreasing speed.

OK Bad idea. Thanks for your input. Scrap the dual count them. Always use one count Got it.

By the way what do you think of the reader who is a shuffle tracker?

I think ST is very difficult and hard to do and not very accurate. I know I cannot do it.

And besides where I play they have the automatic shuffling machine anyhow so ST is not possible but even if it was I think it is too hard to do and not accurate.

What is your opinion on ST?

[stopgambling]

OK Bad idea. Thanks for your input. Scrap the dual count them. Always use one count Got it.

By the way what do you think of the reader who is a shuffle tracker?

I think ST is very difficult and hard to do and not very accurate. I know I cannot do it.

And besides where I play they have the automatic shuffling machine anyhow so ST is not possible but even if it was I think it is too hard to do and not accurate.

What is your opinion on ST?

You think inside the box , trying to squeeze water out of a rock. : )