Big savings should override any objection to team play.

[moo321]

Thought it was a good way to show team savings, by trying to contrast what a casino receives. I would expect each member
would take turns playing. I also was addressing the trust issue among members. There is a contrast between what you perceive a team advantage is,by all playing together as opposed to the savings I mentioned on minimum bets. I really don't know which method is better. Perhaps someone could run a sim and post the results whether savings show a better result than your method.

I still don't know what you're saying. Can you start from the beginning and pretend you're talking to a small child?

[falling star]

I still don't know what you're saying. Can you start from the beginning and pretend you're talking to a small child?

A solo player must bet the table minimum $25.
A team solo player must also bet $25 (table minimum), but in reality is only betting 1/5 (his share of the bankroll).
If all team members are playing at the same time, there is no savings, because each is betting the $25.
Playing spotters at other high limit tables are also costing the bankroll.