It really is messy given restraints and interactions. I start with the math in CVCX. But, then I use an iterative technique that requires tens of millions of instruction executions to maximize SCORE.
It really is messy given restraints and interactions. I start with the math in CVCX. But, then I use an iterative technique that requires tens of millions of instruction executions to maximize SCORE.
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
What do you mean by restraints and interactions? I assume a restraint would be min & max bet, risk, that sort of thing. I'm not really sure about interactions, at least not a way I can articulate what I think you mean by it.Originally Posted by Norm
How would an optimal bet ramp look without the restraints & interactions? Or is it that there are restraints & interactions in blackjack that would make the question impossible to answer?
"Everyone wants to be rich, but nobody wants to work for it." -Ryan Howard [The Office]
Well for one, change the spread and all those numbers change. Remember that we are looking for overall top SCORE at a specified risk. Interactions come into play for the actual bets, since we don't bet pennies or oddball numbers. You can't just round all the optimal bets as changing one changes the risk and may require adjusting other bets, which then changes how optimal the first change was. It's an iterative process, particularly if you select the option to avoid rainbow stacks.
Last edited by Norm; 08-27-2019 at 07:57 AM.
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
Posting Permissions
-*-
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks