https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIK8FoHU0Z8
Pray tell, does this guy show any mathematics at all on how his system works? The application of combinatorics can invalidate his claim that "card counting and BS do not work!"
Also in the comment section:
makeshiftplayer: "Why not run this through a simulation? ??"
blackjacksecretcode: "Simulations are programs, programs have programmers, programmers are biased. I have used this system for many years playing professionally, I have made a great deal of money, I have lived a free life without having to have a job, I have used that time to study and better myself, I already know the system works.....?"
If I am not mistaken this is called a non-sequtiur. An invalid argument. Just because a programmer possesses biases, (such biases he did not state however,) does not mean the programmer is unaware of those/these "biases" and will avoid such errors when programming.Also, just because he knows the system works, does not mean that it work for everyone. He has not proven in his statement the mechanics of how the internal working affect his EV in the long run.
blackjacksecretcode: "The player and dealer have a 50/50 chance of winning, there is no way the dealer can have an advantage." Again, simple combinatorics would invalidate this statement as the dealer possesses an advantage due to the player acting first. If the player assumed a 50/50 chance of winning/losing, then I would suggest that a no-bust strategy would be sufficient enough to overcome the 0-EV game. However; as stated before, simple mathematics dictates that is not the case and the no-bust strategy is a massively LOSING strategy.
I will waste my next 90 minutes seeing what this guy has to say.
You can email me at: [email protected]
Don't think you have a winning game; know you have a winning game.
Bookmarks