-
Don Schlesinger: Re: Grosjean VS Cacarulo on 10,10 Insurance
> Grosjean on page 12 of "Beyond Counting"
> recommends taking insurance when holding 10,10 at
> below the indice value in order to lower variance. I
> believe Griffin in the "elephant edition"
> was also a proponent of this strategy?
James mentions this as a diversionary tactic, to deflect heat. It isn't meant to be mathematically rigorous.
> Cacarulo on this site recommends taking 10,10 RA
> insurance at a higher indice [index] value.
Cac's numbers are mathematically precise. They take into account the two-card hand combination, and he furnishes both an e.v.-maximizing index and a risk-averse index for each possible holding.
> I can see how both are right, but which is superior?
What does "superior" mean? E.v. maximizing? Optimal risk-averse? Best for cover?
Don
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks