-
Sun Runner: Re: being paid for not playing
> I can probably tell you what the catch is, if you can comment on the matter ...
>> The true story is, that my partner told me, I spent the time with him, and I don?t have to play
>> BJ. I will receive every month like 2K, and cannot play.
I can't tell if you are asking Don or Angela, but if responding to Angela it seems plain what the 'catch' is. She can keep her $100K BR on the sideline earning 5% ... and if I undertand her right, pick up 'every month like 2K' if she 'spent the time' with 'my partner' and not playing.
I see plenty of risk. I'd be getting my 'every month like 2K' paid in advance on the first if it were me. Mr. Partner Man seems a little domineering as well as short sighted.
Personally, if she is any good, I think I'd play, deal with the flux, and not be beholden to partner dude.
-
John May: Re: being paid for not playing
Sorry I thought the explanation might be more exotic.
> Personally, if she is any good, I think I'd play, deal
> with the flux, and not be beholden to partner dude.
The first book on gambling I ever read described the professional gambler as "beholden to no man". That's what got me interested. I agree, play and deal, your freedom is priceless.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks