-
Parker: Agree with Don
I greatly appreciate your taking the time to attempt to quantify this.
I must confess that, when I read your post, I also overlooked the error (even after repeated readings), which is why I called in the "big gun." :-)
Thanks in part to your post, I think we can now safely conclude, beyond any reasonable doubt, that this is not a viable method of attacking a "blind pitch" game.
. . . um, which is what I've maintained all along, but nevermind, let's not go there :-)
-
Adam N. Subtractum: Parker...
> I greatly appreciate your taking the time to
> attempt to quantify this.
It's my pleasure.
> I must confess that, when I read your post,
> I also overlooked the error (even after
> repeated readings),
Sure you're not just sayin' that to make me feel better? ;-)
which is why I called in
> the "big gun." :-)
And he fired away with precision, as always.
> Thanks in part to your post, I think we can
> now safely conclude, beyond any reasonable
> doubt, that this is not a viable method of
> attacking a "blind pitch" game.
Undoubtedly.
> . . . um, which is what I've maintained all
> along, but nevermind, let's not go there :-)
If you know me Parker, I'm the type of guy to explore all possible avenues before taking directions. Alot more time consuming, and sometimes costly...but I enjoy the ride.
ANS
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks