Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: lolasdad: Anyone try Scoblete's unbalanced "Golden Touch"?

  1. #1
    lolasdad
    Guest

    lolasdad: Anyone try Scoblete's unbalanced "Golden Touch"?

    Just wondering if anyone has seriously tried Scoblete's "Golden Touch" unbalanced count. I'm a high-low myself, but have recently begun trying it out when I'm a little tired and want to ease my brain a bit -- and darn if it doesn't give me pretty decent results. Not quite as powerful as high-low with indices, but if I can ultimately play longer undetected because of its variations on BS, why not give it a shot occasionally? Any thoughts?

  2. #2
    Parker
    Guest

    Parker: Speed Count

    This has been discussed at length in this forum. Just use the search function at the top of the index page, and search for "speed count."

    Bottom line: The count is vastly inferior to hi-lo (with indices). If you want to use an unbalanced count, learn KO. It is just about as easy (especially Norm's REKO variant), and gives results similar to Hi-lo.

    I probably don't need to tell you that your personal results are meaningless, due to the small sample size.

  3. #3
    Daily Dubble
    Guest

    Daily Dubble: Re: Anyone try Scoblete's unbalanced "Golden Touch"?

    > Just wondering if anyone has seriously tried
    > Scoblete's "Golden Touch" unbalanced count.
    > I'm a high-low myself, but have recently begun trying
    > it out when I'm a little tired and want to ease my
    > brain a bit

    I recall someone calling this the best count to use when you are too drunk to count...

  4. #4
    Norm Wattenberger
    Guest

    Norm Wattenberger: Re: Anyone try Scoblete's unbalanced "Golden Touch"?

    KL said that. But he may have been drunk at the time.

    > I recall someone calling this the best count to use
    > when you are too drunk to count...

  5. #5
    Wylie
    Guest

    Wylie: Here's a good "rule of thumb"

    If Frank Scoblete wrote about it, he's probably exaggerated it or its erroneous. :-)

    Don't waste time learning a system that will give you only a micro edge, yet requires you to look like a counter while risking your bankroll.

    Learning a system is just one part of playing a winning game in real casino environment. REKO gets my vote for easiest yet quite powerful.

    -Wylie

  6. #6
    lolasdad
    Guest

    lolasdad: Re: Here's a good "rule of thumb"

    Thanks, I agree -- I can (and do) play this count drunk. Part of the charm, I guess.

    Perhaps this is a novice question, but I've been using advantage play strategies for about five years now. I am definitely familiar with the Vancura/Fuchs KO count -- but could someone please tell me what REKO is? I haven't heard that term before.

    My apologies if it's a dumb newbie question.

    Thanks.

  7. #7
    Parker
    Guest

    Parker: REKO


    Not a dumb newbie question at all, since it has gotten little exposure outside of this forum.

    REKO (not to be confused with RICO) stands for Ridiculously Easy KO, and is a variant of Vancura & Fuchs Knockout (KO) count.

    It was developed by Norm Wattenberger, creator of the incredible Casino Verite blackjack software suite. It only uses one index number, yet compares favorably with KO Preferred and Hi-lo.

    Find out more at the link below.



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.