-
7up: What is the SCORE by using computer?
4 decks, 70% pen
DOA, No DAS, S17, Insurance
Spread=30X
What is the SCORE, on 100% playing efficiency and 100% betting correlation (input each card into computer)?
Or how much improvement compare with using HiLo, full indexes?
Thanks
-
Magician: 100% efficiency
> 4 decks, 70% pen
> DOA, No DAS, S17, Insurance
> Spread=30X
> What is the SCORE, on 100% playing efficiency and 100%
> betting correlation (input each card into computer)?
> Or how much improvement compare with using HiLo, full
> indexes?
I don't know the answer to your question but it's worth keeping in mind that a computer can actually do better than 100% playing efficiency and betting correlation by determining the exact expectation of the remaining subset, rather than using EORs, which are linear approximations. The improvement is probably marginal at 70% pen.
-
7up: Perfect Play
> by determining the exact expectation of
> the remaining subset
I thought it is "100% playing efficiency". So I should use the term "perfect play".
Thanks
-
Magician: Re: Perfect Play
> I thought it is "100% playing efficiency".
> So I should use the term "perfect play".
If you want to maximise win rate you should. These terms are only equivalent off the top of the deck. For example, suppose that only 10-valued cards remain in the deck. A system with 100% BC will tell you that you have a large advantage but clearly your advantage is exactly zero.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks