-
Brick: True count charts.
Norm,hope you're still around. I noticed on the TC charts the ev per true count raises significantly at about 3. This I understand due to insurance,what I dont understand, is why the TC raises significantly between the counts of .5 to 1.5?
Thanks,again.
-
Norm Wattenberger: Which chart exactly? *NM*
-
Brick: Advantage by True Count
-
Norm Wattenberger: Re: Advantage by True Count
Well you are going from a neutral shoe to a positive shoe. Finding out exactly which plays make the difference requires two veryt long sims and the CVData SimTract feature.
-
Brick: Re: Advantage by True Count
> Well you are going from a neutral shoe to a
> positive shoe.
Actually,I thought we are going from a negative shoe to positive. I'm using this information from the previous ev calcualtions you posted below. So are you saying ev is linear from neutral counts to 1.5?
-
Don Schlesinger: 16 v. 10 for sure
> Well you are going from a neutral shoe to a
> positive shoe. Finding out exactly which
> plays make the difference requires two very
> long sims and the CVData SimTract feature.
After insurance, 16 v. 10 is surely the most important play.
Don
-
Norm Wattenberger: Using a magnifing glass
EV is not linear at all. In Blackjack, the cards themselves are integers. We can't draw a deuce.1. If you took a magnifying glass and looked at every possible exact penetration with 20 decimals of precision, you would find that most exact TC's would only exist at a partcular penetration with a particular subset looking vary unlike its neighbors. Really doen't make much sense to look that closely.
www.Blackjack-Scams.com
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks