-
w34p0n2m4n: BJ in Colorado
I'm hoping someone who understands the theory better can help me with this.
I've been playing in Cripple Creek, Colorado. Where the min and max bet are $5. You can get more money out there with splits, DD and playing multiple hands, but you're pretty much restricted to flat betting.
Assuming I play perfect BS, have a perfect Hi-Opt I RC, a roughly accurate TC, where can I gain an advantage? It seems the only way is to "go to the bathroom" when the count drops into freezing territory and split everything in sight when the dealer has a bust-card. Hopefully I'm missing something.
Also, I've been having a hard time seeing a correlation between counts and wins/losses. When the count gets high/low should I play more passive/aggresive based on how likely the dealer is to bust or should I just play straight BS?
Thanks y'all
-
Parker: Re: BJ in Colorado
> I'm hoping someone who understands the
> theory better can help me with this.
> I've been playing in Cripple Creek,
> Colorado. Where the min and max bet are $5.
> You can get more money out there with
> splits, DD and playing multiple hands, but
> you're pretty much restricted to flat
> betting.
> Assuming I play perfect BS, have a perfect
> Hi-Opt I RC, a roughly accurate TC, where
> can I gain an advantage? It seems the only
> way is to "go to the bathroom"
> when the count drops into freezing territory
> and split everything in sight when the
> dealer has a bust-card. Hopefully I'm
> missing something.
> Also, I've been having a hard time seeing a
> correlation between counts and wins/losses.
> When the count gets high/low should I play
> more passive/aggresive based on how likely
> the dealer is to bust or should I just play
> straight BS?
Since you're counting, use indices. With Hi-Opt 1 and full indices, you should be able to pretty much overcome the house edge, depending on rules, # of decks, etc. Do not split/double unless basic strategy or the count calls for it.
Try to play at uncrowded tables so you can spread to 2 or more hands in positive counts.
If the game is single deck and you can spread to 3 hands in positive counts, and use full indice strategy variations, you would be playing at a decent positive expectation, although the actual monetary expectation would be something around minimum wage.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks