-
Brick: BJ theory
Many BJ simulators will take into account of cards "observed" when wonging.
For instance; A simulator assumes we can jump in and out of shoes as we please and bet accordingly,however,from my experience in real casino conditions, this is not a practical way and I do not alway agree with these kind of sims.
What I usually do is wong out at a TC of -3 and do not stick around hoping for the count to go plus again.
Since the TC's in a shoe game are less erratic and I wong out at -3TC, in theory I will get credit for seeing or "observing" many negative hands even though I've long left the table. In other words I get credit of observing more hands per hour when all I did was leave the table. Hence, my win rate is significantly increased according to simulalors.
Here's,something else to think about; If you backcount a total of 100 rounds at four different tables and leave the casino without placing a single bet(due to negative counts) do you still get your win rate!?
Bye.
-
Norm Wattenberger: Re: BJ theory
CVData supports three methods:
1. Allow re-entry in the same shuffle
2. Do not allow re-entry until the shuffle
3. Force a shuffle after exit. (Look for another table.)
-
Don Schlesinger: Re: BJ theory
You might want to read Chapter 13, Part I of BJA3.
Don
-
Brick: Re: BJ theory
I need to finish reading BJA2. Any suggestions for chapters in that book. I assume you and Norm agree with my BJ theory and simulators.
-
Brick: I guess I'll break down.) *NM*
-
Brick: Never mind,
I cant find my old book!)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks