Kiddangerous: my arsenal is now pretty heavy....

[Don Schlesinger]

> I agree that 3rd base is best. But I have
> always been troubled by this question. When
> you figure out how much to bet due to the
> count, would it be more accurate if you were
> at first base, instead of third? Or is the
> difference not worth worrying about?

No, it would not be more accurate. The true count shows no tendency to change (the running count does) as cards are dealt. The third base player, on average, faces the exact same true count that the first place player does, at the start of the round.

Don

[GT]

[ET Fan]

[WallStRunoff]