The data at your website that euphdude is refering to.
The data at your website that euphdude is refering to.
> No, unfortunately I don't have those
> statistics anymore. I calculated those
> SCOREs a long time ago.
When you say TKO is the best level one system, would your endorsement extend to SD and DD play also?
> What I do have are the SCOREs for 6D.
I assumed TKO (KO) would measure up well in multi-decks. Can you post the TKO SCOREs for 6D?
Thank you.
> When you say TKO is the best level one
> system, would your endorsement extend to SD
> and DD play also?
Yes, assuming the other systems don't use any side count and that we are using a decent spread.
If you're going to flat-bet then any system with a higher PE will do better.
> I assumed TKO (KO) would measure up well in
> multi-decks. Can you post the TKO SCOREs for
> 6D?
Rules: 6D, S17, DOA, DAS, SPA1, SPL3, NS, 5/6 pen, Catch-22 indices, 1 player, 5000 million rounds on my personal simulator.
Table of SCOREs
1-4 1-8 1-12 1-16 1-20
TKO 10.41 27.41 36.81 42.64 46.59
UBZII(R) 10.79 27.72 36.61 41.92 45.43
Hi-Opt II 10.76 27.30 36.27 41.72 45.38
Hi-Opt I/A 10.25 26.69 35.66 41.16 44.92
DRed7(R) 10.17 26.65 35.38 40.63 44.11
KO(R) 8.62 25.52 34.94 40.69 44.55
Hi-Lo 9.61 25.83 34.84 40.43 44.24
Uston +/- 9.39 25.32 34.28 39.82 43.59
Rev.Adv.+/-/A 9.53 25.27 33.92 39.23 42.83
Griffin/A 9.34 24.94 33.57 38.89 42.53
Silver Fox 9.13 24.71 33.37 38.76 42.41
Hi-Opt I 8.22 22.45 30.32 35.18 38.44
Rev.Adv.+/- 7.64 21.30 28.91 33.58 36.77
Note: I put an (R) to show which systems go in Running-Count mode.
Enjoy!
Cac
> The data at your website that euphdude is
> refering to.
The data on my comparisons page would be for true counting. As the page says "Note: Playing Efficiency (as defined by Griffin) is not relevant to unbalanced card counting systems." I should probably stress this more strongly.
> The data on my comparisons page would be for
> true counting. As the page says "Note:
> Playing Efficiency (as defined by Griffin)
> is not relevant to unbalanced card counting
> systems." I should probably stress this
> more strongly.
What you should write is: "Playing Efficiency (as defined by Griffin) is not relevant to unbalanced card counting systems in running-count mode."
Don
Bookmarks