Hi all, I was reading up what I could find on counter basic strategy. I believe it was Arnold Snyder who came up with this concept from what I read. He and others including KJ seem to agree that the cost of using no indices at all and using this modified basic strategy is very minimal. Also this minimal cost should be offset in longevity by not varying plays which are obvious tip offs that someone is a counter. I was just wondering what everybody thought about this. In my eyes if one is playing without indices then hilo is surely the count to use with its high betting efficiency and simplicity. I also assume that with this strategy that you would want to avoid negative counts even more and insurance is another issue...surely we should not just blindly insure in counts that dont justify it. If I remember right their sims claim very little loss in EV. thanks
Bookmarks