When I generate Hi-Lo Risk Averse Indices, CVData shows that on 8 deck shoes, the TC at which to take insurance becomes +4 (instead of +3). I've thought about whether this is correct and why this is the case for RA, and I think it may be because Insurance is really a side-bet, so perhaps variance is going up by taking it.
Since the generated TC to take is +2 for single deck, +3 for double deck and 6 deck, and +4 for 8-deck, CVData shows that the TC to take Insurance gradually rises as the size of the starting shoe increases. But at a resolution of a full increment of true count, I am wondering if the proper count for 8-deck is closer to +3.5 than +4.0.
Now to my question, is there any option in CVData that allows for a finer resolution on TC to take Insurance? I wouldn't care so much about other deviations, but I think the Insurance decision may be impactful enough to care about the half true count.
thanks!
-Asmodeus
Bookmarks