Gramazeka,
Perhaps I am the only one, and forgive me if I am wrong, but I am finding your posts of late to be objectionable. With all due respect, to me, they have a 'slippery,' dishonest feel.
Examples: "Only provable if you yourself admit it," "professional casino cheaters," "robbing pirate schooners."
Aside from giving other, more legitimate advantage plays a bad name, I believe (at least what I understand of the methods you support) them to be underhanded and deceitful.
In my view, the following are good ways to assess whether a strategy passes the honesty test:
1) Is it really possible I could be breaking the law? (If so, don't do it - "When in doubt, don't.") Future 'movement' of your play is likely only going to be in the illegal, not legal, direction.
2) Am I relying on an electronic or mechanical advantage, or am I using something that is usually more subtle - an advantage obtained through brainpower?
3) Do I feel good about myself afterward?
One more thing, and I believe this REALLY won't go over well.
You consistently quote Jesus in your posts, but, again, in my view, the content of your posts do not align with Jesus' teachings. (Yes, I do understand Jesus does not condone 'gambling' at all and would probably not even be inclined to debate 'advantage play' vs. gambling.). Please omit "Jesus" and His words from such posts.
Bookmarks