Beyond Counting: Exhibit CAA - Needed

[Raybabyray]

There is something wrong with your sim. Do you get basic strategy 0.42 HE without implementing Kats strategy?

I studied the h17 variant and my CVdata play-all scores aligned pretty close with the ones she published.

Pictured are my custom system compared with hers.

Thanks for sharing.

Where can we get HE from CVData?

I am referring to her book "The Pro's Guide to Spanish 21 and Australian Pontoon". In page 89, Table 6.11 shows back counting scores, H17 is around 27. I am getting the similar result from simulation.

In Page 90, table 6.12 shows H17 game 81.25 pen , we are getting 7.0 score playing all using full indices. This is similar to what I have from CVData.

The bet spread used to calculate score is TC <1 $25 x 1, TC =2 $50 x 2, TC=3 $100 x 2, TC>=4 $200 x 2

[Gronbog]

The bet spread used to calculate score is TC <1 $25 x 1, TC =2 $50 x 2, TC=3 $100 x 2, TC>=4 $200 x 2

In order to get true SCOREs for comparison with those in Walker's book you must use a $10,000 bankroll and optimal bets rounded to the nearest dollar.

[Raybabyray]

In order to get true SCOREs for comparison with those in Walker's book you must use a $10,000 bankroll and optimal bets rounded to the nearest dollar.

I assume by “optimal bets” it means bet spread with minimum ROR. But bet spread is determined by minimum chip size and table minimum. What are the standard for these?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[DSchles]

I assume by “optimal bets” it means bet spread with minimum ROR.

No, it means making Kelly-optimal bets that aren't resized as the bankroll fluctuates in order to generate a SCORE, which, arbitrarily, for standardization, is based on a $10,000 bankroll.

Don