Eliot, that above video of yours is deceptive to say the least. For example the reasons that you gave for not to become a card counter, I take issue with the #4 example. In that example you talk about a card counter wonging using perfect play and only playing positive counts while betting $100 every positive count. You showed a winning percentage for the six deck game of H17, DOA,DAS as $33.58 per hundred hands played, and $66.29 when playing a double deck game with the same rules that the six deck game had, also including betting $100 on all positive counts and nothing on everything else, to which I consider the entire example stupid, and extremely deceptive to say the least. What do you think your numbers would be if the same wonger used a 1 to 4 spread instead "while still betting in only all positive counts". You deliberately made your own obvious biased opinion to make the numbers look bad.
Bookmarks