Results 1 to 13 of 60

Thread: Wong Halves System Complete Index

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 12-11-2019, 02:41 AM #1
    James989
    James989 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    625

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    The correct index is +3. It's what I have for the RPC, it's what Wong gives for Halves in Pro BJ, and it's what Norm shows here: https://www.card-counting.com/cvcxonlineviewer3.htm

    You can't calculate indices as above; you don't account for any neutral cards that are in the group removed, and you have to include them. Doing "reprenstative decks" is never accurate in any event.

    Don

    Can you show me on what page(in Pro BJ) show wong halves index of +3 for (4,4) vs 4 ? What I can found is +1 on Page 283.

    WH index.jpg
    Last edited by James989; 12-11-2019 at 02:47 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-11-2019, 08:31 AM #2
    DSchles
    DSchles is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5,183

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by James989 View Post
    Can you show me on what page(in Pro BJ) show wong halves index of +3 for (4,4) vs 4 ? What I can found is +1 on Page 283.

    WH index.jpg
    The 1994 revision of the book went through many printings. Mine is from 2013 (the latest). And where your arrow points in now +3.

    Don
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-11-2019, 05:13 PM #3
    James989
    James989 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    625

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    The 1994 revision of the book went through many printings. Mine is from 2013 (the latest). And where your arrow points in now +3.

    Don

    Thanks for your reply.

    I need your comments on this. The indices interact with one another as pointed out by NORM. For example, to find indices vs dealer up card 8, we should sim through a shoe(to cover all possible subsets) and start the process "backward", meaning we should first find the index for total 18 vs 8, and then index for 17 vs 8 . . .until index for 9 vs 8.

    Am I correct ?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. Wong halves vs hi lo
    By blueman in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-30-2016, 09:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Other QFIT Sites

Internal Links

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.