LOL yeah of course you won't "get into any details". Because you are full of shit, just like Don called you out on again haha. You always pretend like you have some "magic plays" that no other BJ player has figured out in 50 years. Get out of here with that...the math is the math.
The stupidest thing I hear is “the math is the math”. The problem is that you can never be “the math”. The math never has to deal with travel expenses, heat, finding a table to play, can always bet optimally, has an unlimited bankroll, never gets fatigue or distracted etc, etc.
Freightman is right that we have to each deal with ways to play through negative counts and develop our own act. Obviously, telling you how he does it on this forum will expose him. You can’t fly to get to a casino, spend hours scouting, find a great fast dealer who gives great penetration and then walk away from that table the first time the count gets negative. You develop your own strategy of how to survive the negative counts and how to compensate the minimal losses with other strategies.
This topic and thread are what I consider a very worthwhile discussion. I would like to touch on both sides "pro and con" on some of what Freightman has said up to this point.
Obviously, under those two above situations, he either plays all or goes home as his hand is being forced either-or. Most of us have faced those type of situations before.
No magic formula here freighter with superlative index play baloney bullshit which can only help so much in a shoe game. By the way, all of that inconsistent play by the index of true count and timing is being noticed upstairs. You are accomplishing victory with your SPREAD period. I realize because of the game table situations there is little else to do. One problem though in playing all hands heads up is the very large percentages of waiting bets "your own minimum bet" that you are making which is giving plenty of information to the eye upstairs especially if you are the only person in the pit playing.
Last edited by BoSox; 07-12-2019 at 07:15 AM.
Negative index play reduces losses, and I play a lot of shit shoes where I get all of the hands. Funny thing though, when they’re good shoes, I still get all of the hands. You do know I’ve been around a long time. I’m a little surprised that you suggest that I don’t know what I’m doing.
I am not suggesting anything but just replying to what you said previously in the thread below:
"The math may be the math, but it is not necessarily the most practical. I make up shitty counts with loads of index play and speed of play. It works for me. "I also realize you are using other tools in the toolbox.
The above quote does not sound like what you are now saying:
Last edited by BoSox; 07-12-2019 at 07:47 AM.
Bookmarks