Adding AA78mTc side count to High Low

[Norm]

No one is lying.

[James989]

No one is lying.

OK, it is my fault/misinterpretation.

[bjanalyst]

I found your book at amazon.com it cost $29.18 for hardcover and $19.99 for paperback. It is not $3 or $4 as you mention. After reading the back cover of your book my previous post about your system stands. You are not only trying to add AA89mTc to KO but your intention is also to add the Am8, 6m2, 87m23 as third dimension side count. I am not keeping three component count in my head, far less likely, that I will do that with casino chips. It won't take long until you make your system into four or five components or even 30 components.

Go to xlibris.com. They sell all my books online for $3.99 I believe. If you buy online buy the PDF version as the EPUB and MOBI versions have resolution problems and are blurry.

My 3rd book covers mainly KO with AA89mTc. I never suggested 87m23c - I never analyzed such a count. I did analyze Am8c if Super 4 bet is offered where S4c = Super 4 count = KO - (1/2)*(AA89mTc) - 1.5*(Am8c) and since if Super 4 bet was offered and you kept Am8c I analyzed some strategy changes using Am8c since you were keeping it for Super 4 anyhow - Am8c helps with hit/stand hard 16 v 7 or 8 where k > 0 and with doubling hard 10 v T where k = -1, i.e double hard 10 v T if KO - Am8c >= crc(4) = 4*n.

If Blazing 7's is offered then keep 5m7c as a 2nd side count to KO which also helps with betting and some playing strategy changes.

[bjanalyst]

In my 3rd book I did analyze 45m23c, not 87m23c. But I just analyzed it to see how it did. I NEVER recommended keeping such a difficult count. My original side count was 45m79c in my 2nd book but in my 3rd book I changed my mind and said use the slightly less powerful but much simpler 5m7x as a 2nd side count and can the 45m79c. Remember easy of use was one of my main criteria. Since AA89mTc is my recommended side count to KO of only one side count is to he kept, the if a 2nd side count is added must be a simple XmYc were only two tanks, X and Y are counted. This I analyzed for possible use 5m7c, Am8c and 6m2c as possible 2nd side counts. Any analysis of a 2nd side count where more than 2 ranks were counted was just for theoretical purposes and not recommended for casino use.

[Three]

Remember easy of use was one of my main criteria.

You say this but you have people using two BALANCED side counts. Many people think keeping one straight side count is too hard. Do you see the huge gulf between your definition of easy and pretty much anyone else's definition of easy?

[bjanalyst]

I think Gronbog will post his sim results within this week, why can't we just wait for sim results ? From there we know who is lying !

I have no received an email from Gronborg so I know what he needs from me. I am still waiting for that email. I wanted to make things as easy as possible so I suggested getting a canned HL sim program, set up.a variable to track AA78mTc abd then make only the 12 illustrious 18 strategy changes that AA78mTc helps the HL with and do not make any other changes to HL program, i.e. use HL for betting and for all other strategy changes. This should give a good idea of where we are going with minimal work. If results look good then more AA78mTc strategy changes to HL can be included but for a first shot just use the 12 Illustrious 18 that Aa78mTc helps with.

[bjanalyst]

You say this but you have people using two BALANCED side counts. Many people think keeping one straight side count is too hard. Do you see the huge gulf between your definition of easy and pretty much anyone else's definition of easy?

The side counts only include a few ranks! AA78mTc includes Ace which is counted in HL but needs to included here to correct for playing strategy decisions where Ace should not be counted as -1. 7 and 8 were not counted in the HL so less chance of making a mistake. The Tens can be considered as one rank. I showed with all the cancellations how easy it is to keep AA78mTc.

If a 2nd side count is to be incorporated then I suggested XmYc where only two ranks are counted,, ranks X and Y.

All side counts are balanced. When side counts are used with the KO the resulting derived perc = playing strategy running count = KO + k1*(5m7c) + k2*(AA89mTc), for example, is also unbalanced with an unbalance of 4 per decks so psrc can use KO Table of Critical Runnung counts. Whenever a balanced count is added to an unbalanced count the resulting count is unbalanced with the same unbalance as the original count.

[bjanalyst]

Xlibris.com link. Scroll down and you can see where you can buy a PDF version of my books for $3.99. Again I an NOT making any money on this so please do not accuse me of pedaling my books. Users requested this information. Also what am I going to make off of $4 plus Xkibris is not even paying me anyhow.

https://www.xlibris.com/Bookstore/Bo...arch=Bjanalyst

[Three]

You really fail to see things from the perspective almost everyone else has. Do you think they care what you say from your lone perspective? What matters to them is their perspective. Is that really that hard to understand?

[Three]

As an example I have a higher bar for what is easy than almost anyone because I have never used a simple approach. I use more difficult approach than you recommend. But I am telling you I think keeping two balanced side counts is extremely difficult and I am not sure I could do it. That is from from my perspective. I already use one balanced side count. I have thought of adding another but I just don't think it is feasible for 1 person to do. A team could do it, but not one person. Except maybe for that very rare individual. That is what I see from my perspective, and my perspective would think it easier than most others because I already use a balanced side count.

This look in the mirror is enlightening.

[Freightman]

This look in the mirror is enlightening.

I often think the same thing.

https://youtu.be/QCsNunGnqE0

[bjanalyst]

I already use one balanced side count. I have thought of adding another but I just don't think it is feasible for 1 person to do. A team could do it, but not one person. Except maybe for that very rare individual.

Just about anyone should be able to keep the primary KO with AA89mT or HL with AA78mTc.

You can either keep AA89mTc (or AA78mTc) in your head, or use chips or use your fingers as I described earlier which I will describe again below.

Also you can use your fingers to count the chips. For example, if AA89mTc were +7 the you can have two fingers from your right hand extended which is +2 and a finger of your left hand on your right wrist which is +5 for a total of +7. Or if AA89MTc were -13 for example, then have three fingers from your left hand on the table for -3 and two fingers on your left wrist for -10 for a total of -13.

And if I use my fingers for the AA89mTc, besides keeping KO in my head I can also keep a side count such as 5m7c (helps with blackjack betting, some playing strategy changes and Blazing 7's side bet if offered) or for example, Am8c as a second side count if Super 4 is offered. Of if I am at the table I can keep one stack of chips for the AA89mTc and one stack of chips for 5m7c. No one bothers me and no one really notices about the chips as far as I know. If Super 4 bet is offered, I use Am8c as my second side count.

[Three]

I give up. He simply refuses to see everyone else's perspective. I am sorry to everyone who may have perceived me like this in the past. I know people must have looked at me the way I am seeing BJanalyst.