Thank you for all your answers.

Great words from highly intelligent folks.

I agree that adjusting after 10% change would happen too frequently and unrealistic.

I am a part time counter at my local casino.

My current goal is to build up my bankroll up to a point where I would feel comfortable to go pro and play full time. (At least 50k is what I'm thinking, 100k would be nice) I wish to get there as fast as possible.

I know that full kelly betting with no adjustments results in a 13.5% RoR, and theoretically, if a player was able to make exact full kelly bets with adjustments after every hand, the RoR would be 0. I am looking for a strategy I can use with my 12k current bankroll, that will get it above 50k asap. Until I become pro, I am willing to have a RoR as high as 15%. I don't intend to quit after losing half my bankroll; it's win all or lose all.

This is what I'm currently doing. I assume a 15k bankroll and bet full kelly. I assume the 15k bankroll because I intend to put a grand into my bankroll every two weeks. I believe that the probability that I lose all the money within 6 weeks is very low, considering I don't have too much time to play anyways.

The RoR for me is higher than 13.5%, because of the many hands I am forced to play at a disadvantage. (only DD where I live) I want a better betting system, one that adjusts the bets as I win or lose. I thought, rather than going full kelly with an assumed 15k BR, I should go full kelly with my current bankroll and make adjustments as I play. One problem was that if I do end up with half my BR, 6k, I can no longer play with my system because I would be playing with no advantage at all at that point. That is why I asked to assume bankrupt at half BR.

Any advice will be of immense help.

Honor to have Don and Three argue here as well.

Thanks!!