He never specified if he had software that could do it. He may have such software. You just can't buy software that can do it as far as I know. People often write their own software or modify purchased software.
I hope the software that runs my system will have this capability some day as I use multiple combined playing counts. If it doesn't it isn't any big deal. I am not trying to sell anything or convince anyone of anything. I just try to inspire people to think outside the box and use my private approach to make money in casinos. I can just base my play on the strongest version the software can do and know I will outperform it. Since I am not selling anything that is good enough for me. If I was selling something I would do whatever it took to get the sims run. It isn't like it can't be simmed, it is just that custom software is required. I am not sure how you can say you have no access to sim software and your clearly wrong assumptions that you say you have proven and expect anyone to have confidence in what you are saying.
I know your approach is an improvement. It will get you a lot back for the insurance bet. But my sense is going to full indices rather than the I18 will get you more than the other indices you site, besides insurance, will get you. They just affect your smallest bets that you should probably have already wonged out to avoid having to make. By just affecting small bets in general it doesn't have much affect in terms of risk aversion or increasing certainty of BR growth. The approach has the potential to affect larger bets with different counts chosen. You targeted the strongest index play, insurance, and did a great job there, but what came along with it isn't worth much. The side count allows you to adjust the weight of the T and A which would set the neutral card weights. But the possibilities don't mesh well were an important impact can be made except for insurance, which you targeted.
You worked the problem backwards. Instead of starting with an arbitrary count and working towards a strong combined count for insurance, start with a great insurance count and work backwards to have pieces that add together with some multiplier and leave you with the strongest main count while factoring in what plays the side count choice will allow to come with insurance (I recommend the balanced version of a great insurance count, there are a few to choose from. A level 5 insurance count limits the possibilities). You ultimately want the strongest betting count possible, a near perfect insurance that brings important plays as different multiples of one count added to the other, and the ability to make several playing counts with a diversity of uses. The betting count can be a combined count as well. You don't have to use the multipliers just on the side count, you can also use them on the main count or both. The 9 is usually not counted as a high card because it messes up insurance and the plays on your 12 totals, which are among the easiest index values to reach. But the 9 can be counted as a high card in one count and a low card in the other count so it can be weighted either way or as a neutral card in one of the combined counts. This way of attacking the problem would reap the highest reward from your approach and allow you to see many more possibilities for choosing two counts to be used.
Bookmarks