0 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
Did you find this post helpful?
Yes |
No
Originally Posted by
Sharpe
I’m new so I’ll ask... Tarzan, what’s your count system? I appreciate your contribution to this thread.
It's not publicly disclosed, relatively complex, not exactly most people's cup of tea, and has gotten its fair share of criticisms. A lot has been covered on old posts about it without having to clog up this thread with any of it. In the card counting section I've demonstrated some of the "nuts and bolts" of it. It was brought up here to demonstrate that if you look close enough and really split hairs, you can mathematically prove out that the index can move dependent upon the no. of decks remaining for some hands, whereas on others it remains unchanged using a composition dependent index.
The lesson to be learned from this thread is that playing slightly risk averse is going to work out a heck of a lot better for you than deviating from basic strategy short of the index and that your index might not be as spot on as you think it is compared to a compositionally dependent generated index, so being ahead of it is better than being short of it.
I'm going to be on the road for a week or two, or whatever it works out to... have fun and play nice while I'm gone.
Bookmarks