Is this advantageous in any meaningful degree? After reading about Edward Thorpe's NAT9 sidebet, and this article:
http://georgejosephtraining.com/Bacc...Back%20Cut.pdf
It got me thinking of how sequencing 9s in hand-shuffled shoe baccarat might be advantageous?
For example, drawing a chart that comprises of 4 columns for each suite (S,C,D,H) of 9s within the shoe. Then for rows, rows = 4*number of decks used, to correlate with the total amount of 9s within the shoe.
After drawing the chart up, you play through one entire shoe and just flat bet the minimum, recording the 2 cards on either side of each 9 and writing them on the correlating side of the relevant 9 seen.
Now the basic idea is exploiting the fact that hand-shuffled shoes aren't entirely random and that there will be clusters that haven't changed their composition entirely. As player always goes first, you can then deduct what may eventuate according to these cluster compositions and what you evidenced in previous rounds, and raise your bet and place it in the box that is likely to get either the highest total or a natural 9.
I apologise if I haven't explained my theory very well, as I'm more mathematically minded in my cognition and struggle to put things like this into words. Or just debunk my theory and show me why. I don't mind.
How would I go about testing this theory?
Bookmarks