Let the games begin.
See i wonder about this - isn't it mostly your spread and then secondarily when you move your money with the count (a sharp pit or at least eye) and then much farther down in the turtley tertiary maybe some advantage plays like splitting tens soft double etc (super sharp pit or eye).
So my question is does making esoteric index plays at slightly different times necessarily fool anyone? Does using a sophisticated count with different index plays throw off anyone besides maybe another counter at the table using high lo wondering why you are making a few index plays differently than he would?
Or does the increased playing efficency mean that you can bet more in a negative count with a higher expectation of winning? That would definitely buy you some cover on a sharp pit or eye but if they see you winning your big bets and losing your small ones doesnt it lead to the same place?
This is of course not a discussion on which count is best but rather in what manner a more sophisticated count adds to longevity
Also if tthree is listening you can pm your answer if you don't want it publicly known how your arithmetical mystical gymnastics throws the pit hounds off your count -scent
Last edited by Ustonzen; 09-08-2017 at 02:33 AM. Reason: Compulsory after sending the troops into the grammatical breech against don
Typing properly is a good habit to get into even if the motivation is provided by egoic pettiness and the pig of smugness wrapped in the buttery, flakey blanket of superiority.
Besides, a sentence properly grammaticated weaves its way into the mind like a slippery ear wig - unencumbered by the friction of bad grammar and the dissonance of improper punctuation
Last edited by Ustonzen; 09-08-2017 at 02:37 AM. Reason: Same
There's little sense in claiming correct or incorrect use of commas, when so much is a matter of preference and style. Yes, I use more commas than most. But I'm just as enraged by people who suppress 90% of them and expect we'll just get along and figure out what they mean anyway. So, do me a favor, please (there are two more for you to stew over!), and save your edits for more substantial transgressions ... if you can find them.
Don
Don, shame on you. You missed
"playing efficency mean that you can bet more in a negative count with a higher expectation of winning? That would definitely buy you some cover on a sharp pit or eye but if "
In post 87.
Still, winner by TKO - Don.
I am agog with anticipation to your next grammatical matchup.
Don is right about gross spelling errors on forum posts being an embarrassment. You would think people on a forum of this type with people of technical expertise would know the difference between there, their, and they're, etc. What are people to think? Great at basic math, able to count, but really shitty at spelling and grammar?
Bookmarks