Moses,
If your going to go through the trouble of learning/using two counts(with all due respect) at least make sure they're worth the effort...Here a two. One( My fav.) is for the RPC count and the other is for Wong halves players(full mode x2)..Personally, i think you should use your Primary count as your Betting count as well...Because for one, it can always be used for Multiple deck by itself...Second. Adding a secondary (playing count) should only be used/added for those who can use RPC and Wong-halves effortlessly and want to add more PE/Style when playing pitch games and more importantly you never have to use them if you dont want too while still maintaining your Primary count as your solo count..
RPC:
Code:
122221 00 -2 -2
+1 -1 (+3)
122222 00 -3 (+1)
BC: .9837
PE:.6801
IC: .947
Halves(x2):
Code:
122321 0-1 -2 -2
+1 -1 (+3)
122322 0-1 -3 (+1)
BC: .9919
PE:..6941
IC: .9015
HalvesVer2(x2):
Code:
122321 0-1 -2 -2
-1 1 1 -1 (+3)
112322 1-1 -3 (+1)
BC: .9919
PE:..70
IC: .9158
Halves Ver3:
Code:
122321 0-1 -2 -2
1 1 -1 (+2)
122322 1-1 -3 (0)
Bc:.919
Pe:.6916
Ic:.9014
As you can see in Halves Version 2 you can take it even one step further and subtract -1 from the 3 an ADD+1 to the 8(same works for RPC) for a Perfect Playing efficiency of .70..Of Course you dont half to do this, but rather just "omit" the 8 all together "as shown" in Version 1 and take a (easier) an "non-linear" approach and just side-count the 8's for an even Higher Pe "inaddtion" to using the Primary counts for Splitting XX's and doubling on 89 n 10...
Bookmarks