See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Results 1 to 13 of 50

Thread: I think I found a serious flaw in most Counting Systems

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thank you Norm. I had never even heard of that book before.

    I am kind of shocked now that it is referred to as "Generally considered the bible for serious blackjack players".

    I currently have the following books. Some of these are much more valuable then others.

    BJ BOOKS
    Professional - Reference Michael Dalton
    BJ Secrets - Stanford Wong
    Knock Out BJ - Olaf Vancura & Ken Fuchs
    Million Dollar BJ - Ken Uston
    Perfect BJ System - Anon
    Science of Casino BJ - N. Richard Werthammer
    World's Greatest BJ Book - Lance Humble & Carl Cooper


    I really enjoy Stanford Wong's book. I often skim through parts of it when I'm too tired to work on my software.

    Let me just tell you my primary thought about the sims that I've seen.

    They all tend to have only one orientation. They all tend to operate in just one way.

    The user specifies a number of parameters. There are a great number of these. I have currently identified about 30. Very diverse kinds of things. But I see this website has a special section devoted to just identifying these parameters. I haven't had time yet. But I intend to visit that section. I am very confused about several of these options that seem to conflict with each other. But I need to stick to working on my software.

    Some of them are:
    "is DAS permitted",
    "how many times may a player split pairs"
    "is doubling on 9 permitted?"
    "is doubling on T permitted?"
    "is doubling on E permitted?"

    Once the user specifies the values of all these parameters (as well as the number of rounds they want the sim to run), the sim begins to chug away and after running the specified number, it comes back and gives a result.

    But there are so many other possible ways a sim can operate. Let me just specify a few.

    Given a specific group of cards for the player and for the dealer and a specific count, find the best Action for each possible hand.
    For example: If the player holds a 7,T or A5 or 9,6 and the Dlr has an up card of 7 or 8 and the TC is +3, run two million rounds and produce the results that show for each combination, how much money will be won or lost depending on whether the player Stands, Hits, Doubles, Splits, Surrenders, etc.

    I think of this configuration as producing the best Actions to take.

    I have a method of setting the count before any hands are played and then playing a round and then resetting the deck to contain that same TC and playing the round again - each time with a different Action. In this way, I can learn the best action to take under any of these circumstances.

    Another config is similar except it looks for the best amount to wager under each condition.

    Do you see where I'm going? I think these kinds of configs are very possible. But, unfortunately, most people seem to think a sim means just one thing. Run it given a specific count system and wagering system and just see what the result is in terms of money won or money lost.

    Once all the hard work is done in producing a sim, it's not that difficult to make it do so many interesting things. It can produce a tremendous wealth of information.

  2. #2
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,502
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyler62 View Post
    Given a specific group of cards for the player and for the dealer and a specific count, find the best Action for each possible hand.
    For example: If the player holds a 7,T or A5 or 9,6 and the Dlr has an up card of 7 or 8 and the TC is +3, run two million rounds and produce the results that show for each combination, how much money will be won or lost depending on whether the player Stands, Hits, Doubles, Splits, Surrenders, etc.
    This can be done either with simulation or combinatorial analysis. CVData does this via simulation, with some CA -- but not in the manner that you think as that's too slow. It takes billions of hands that are relevant, which would be trillions in a normal counting sim.

    Quote Originally Posted by Skyler62 View Post
    Another config is similar except it looks for the best amount to wager under each condition.
    For non-camouflage play, this is done after a sim as per Kelly Criterion. You will note in CVCX, you do not set any betting strategy before a sim. You can change the bets after a sim and instantly see changes in results. Or, change depth, rules, decks, bankroll, desired risk and instantly have it calculate the best bets without rerunning the sim. If you wish to use cover play, that still must be handled via separate sims.
    Last edited by Norm; 02-25-2017 at 07:46 AM.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

Similar Threads

  1. fat chris: counting systems
    By fat chris in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-10-2004, 06:37 PM
  2. Gladstone: Counting systems
    By Gladstone in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-13-2004, 07:32 PM
  3. John: Counting Systems
    By John in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-05-2003, 01:21 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.