UBZ2 in CVCX

**Phoebe** · 12-23-2016, 05:27 AM

I hope that somebody has simulate UBZ in CVCX.
If so, did you compare with included simulation ?

Performance seems not accurate and included strategy do not take DAS in account.

Same problem with REKO too but I ran my own simulations and trust there (SCORE is 10% better in 1-6 decks. 8 decks are same)
BTW, Norm, that the strategy is not included in CVCX's sim (as in CVData) is a pain.

**Norm** · 12-23-2016, 05:52 AM

The UBZ2 strategy in CVCX was built using a pre-published version that George sent me. It probably has had changes since.

**Phoebe** · 12-23-2016, 05:54 AM

Thank you, Norm. Clear answer as always.

**seriousplayer** · 12-23-2016, 08:24 AM

For UBZII I generated new indices in CVDATA then did a resim. The included indices did not seem to outperform KO but after using new indices the results were different.

**Phoebe** · 12-24-2016, 10:12 AM

Well, a confirmation.
Do you used all indices ?

**seriousplayer** · 12-24-2016, 12:33 PM

Originally Posted by Philippe B

Well, a confirmation.
Do you used all indices ?

For Six and Eight deck games I use twenty two indices plus the Fab 4. When I did the simulation for single and double deck I used all indices. I am not a user of the UBZII yet. I charted the included UBZII with the new generated indices from CVDATA I called it UBZII Catch 22 + Fab 4 and it outperform the included UBZII in a significant margin. Heads up simulation was done. But the included UBZII has only 23 indices including the insurance and surrendering.