0 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
Did you find this post helpful?
Yes |
No
Originally Posted by
Tthree
Ir is funny because I didn't have a case because I wasn't cheated. The conditions there required a different approach that I never managed to crack. I had to modify my approach at Harrah's Philly to start winning. And I am not on the positive side of variance. My system is quite precise and doesn't stray much from expectation. That means I put in the time carefully selecting when to play and I make my EV. I actually usually stay a hair above it because adjusting to live play is more accurate than general adjustments you can qualify in a sim. I have had one month runs of over and under EV and even almost flat BR over the period but expand the time a couple weeks and I make EV. This is what you expect if you do all the stuff that everyone says isn't worth it. Your EV doesn't improve much from any individual tweak but you are tightening your decision bell curves with each one which makes you stay closer to EV. I rarely have two losing days in a row and my winning days tend to be higher magnitude than the losers. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to see what the overall trend will be and that it won't take long to reach equilibrium compared to others with extremely wide bell curves around their decisions. It really is the most basic math of the statistics of the game.
Your last sentences in the quote sound like my history at the casino I play that offers by far the best theoretical game out there. I won't say what they did to make it hard. No need to give casinos a blueprint for making it tough for us. But everything they did was legal. What I did to make my results this way was I stayed too long. I wanted to win too much. And should have been more selective about when I played. Basically it was a poor exit strategy. Almost every visit I could have left an easily tolerated win with little exposure. I wanted more since the game was so good. Had I left I would have been up huge there but I didn't and usually left after losing it back and then some or without winning much more. Then, just as any deeply dealt casino would do, they would give me the signal they had had enough of me for the day. If I played too much after that I would surely be backed off. They have known I am a counter for years as I assume most places do. the key to longevity is to keep wins small enough and not to visit too often. All the big wins came within a short time of arrival. The idea that it is all one big session seemed to bite me in the ass when I use it as an excuse to stay. In general either I win too much or I give some back while increasing my exposure. At this place it seemed to always be the latter. Both are bad for the longevity player.
You will never crack why you are losing with that attitude. As soon as you make the excuse that you are being cheated you close the door to learning more about how to win and why you lose. Everyone talks to you about what you are doing wrong or the reason your plans will fail. You never listen to any of them and then wonder why you fail. In another thread you made the absolutely absurd comment that one of the members here with the most experience and one of the few that probably has a 7 figure lifetime win is an amateur. While describing a relative newbie like yourself as being an expert. This attitude easily explains why you continually seem to be behind the eight ball in life. You never learn from anyone else mistakes. You have to make each and every mistake every counter has ever made before you will learn the lesson you could have learned by listening to those that have walked the road before you. This is no doubt true in every aspect of your life. Grow up and realize you can learn so much from those that have walked the path before you. Then you can avoid all the pitfalls that the others your age avoid which makes you feel like everything is against you.
You know what's really funny? I would love for someone to go and test my skill in a casino and ill show you im making absolutely no mistakes, so all your assumptions that im playing wrong are absurd. My game is absolutely perfect and like I said, the casino is cheating or im cursed. There's no mis-sized discard trays or thin cards or anything that is throwing me off. I account for all of thatas I've seen casinos try to do that. I account for card thickness due to heavy wear throughout the day and temperature in the casino. I do all that by visualizing the 6 decks in the discard or sometimes when they use 8 decks in the discard and visualize the midpoint to make sure I know where the exact measurements are due to those other indirect factors that i just mentioned above that can possibly throw your deck estimation off.
Nothing is wrong with my game for the millionth time and ive tested it also on verite millions of times. Some people are just plain lucky in their life and think they're some type of savant. Just look at smallcapgrowth who was recently on GWAE and said hes close to making a million. You actually think he's better than me? It's just completely laughable. All he has is the bankroll and more time than I do with also much better luck than i have. I think my problem is I just dont play enough to have the math sort itself out, but whenever I do it's over. But even with a lot of hours played I will need some luck like flash and smallcap to be on the good side of positive variance to have a really good year and not just your normal average EV year or below EV type of year. I bet you flash and smallcap with the hours ive logged wouldve been up huge or at least at EV just due to sheer luck, while me on the other hand im on the -2-3 SD less than 5% chance side of the bell curve. Life's good isnt it?
Just give me half the luck you guys have and there's not one person who can outpace me in lifetime win by the time my life is over.
Bookmarks