Do NOT ask questions like that.Originally Posted by LoneWoLF
I know you have been BO at least twice. It isn't about not winning much it is about winning too much or betting too much for their tolerance thresholds. You were advised about tolerance thresholds and both bet enough (top bet) to be a constant blip on their radar and went above the daily win threshold point. You made sure they took a real close look at you while you were strictly back counting or mostly back counting. I told you it was coming based on what you told me you had just done. It took an extra visit or two but you got the almost certain BO as expected.
So now after saying you don't doubt me, you are a doubter or at least a mud slinger. I see where we stand.
Yeah, but at that store the lifetime win BO should be 6 figures. I told you how to disguise your spread so you could get away with more. Also not playing rated is a big red flag. You give up valuable comps to be looked at closer and get a BO quicker and then they still know your name based on the license plate recognition. Now your car will flag you every place in the area.
I am not sure I would call that cover. Good cover is doing things no AP would do. Short sessions is what most AP's do. What you accomplish with short sessions is you are tolerable not get them to think you aren't a counter.
Yes, that is often a problem. I am not walking away from a monster count no matter how much I have won.
That is not true for everyone. It depends on a lot of factors. The first is how much they like having you in the casino. From your posts I believe they would be quick to act against you because you don't show the staff respect.
You have at least 3 playable casinos near you. You play at the closest, then go to the next and then the third. If time permits and you haven't won too much at the one or both of the other casinos you hit them on the way back. Odds are you won't have enough time in the day to finish that rotation. If you do you probably have won the win threshold quickly and went along to the next place.
Certainly going ace neutral rather than level 3 is much more useful to keep people in doubt but it will help.
This is not true. The strongest counts identify advantages the weakest ones don't and see disadvantage where the weaker ones see advantage. I played Hiopt2 at the same table as a Hilo counter and we bet quite differently most of the time. I played next to a level 3 count user and we identified the same advantage runs but he raised his bet before I did and was lowering it while I saw advantage still increasing. I think this quoted statement might be the biggest red herring of all the misinformation that is spewed as rhetoric.
What does that tell you about what counts you should be considering if you want to not look like what they are expecting from a counter.
This is just very wrong. If this is your experience either you don't understanding what you are doing that is drawing heat or you haven't played craftily enough.
Nothing because you won't be using my count. I have been asked not to talk about my count because it is not useful to the forum. I only told of the techniques and few if any understood what I was doing. Talking about an unknown count that is so different from the traditional count just has no use to others. I only talked about it to inspire others to think outside the box and open their mind to a different way of using information. I think I may have had limited success with the former but feel I have all but almost totally failed in the latter. Let's talk about systems that are available to you. There is nothing to be gained talking about systems you couldn't use even if you wanted to.
Please everyone, no more questions about my count.
If you are interested search my archived posts. You will see how unproductive the discussion is to the forum and get an idea of what my system is about. I have discussed it enough. You may need to subscribe to read most of them.
I am not interested in learning your count. I am just interested in seeing how much I left on the table if I had this count available to me. How much more would it add to my bottom line from + $150,000. Would it be a extra 5 or 10 grand? I would like to see if it is worth the mental gymnastics. A simple sim should give you the answer. I gave you the conditions and number of hours per year. Simple question how much would you have made playing under these conditions using your count.
Of course it can be simmed. But, it is a non-standard methodology. It would require specialized software. It doesn't sound like you understand the complexity of simulation.
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
To my knowledge, there are only a few sufficiently talented math/stats/computer folk who could generate a sim for T3 or Tarzan counting methods, including 3-4 that periodically post on this site. I suspect that 1 has aided T3, but I believe that person should be accorded privacy, unless and until (if ever) such time as she/he discloses simulating T3's counting system.
In no way do I believe that T3 should, nor that he has any right to disclose/confirm any sims having actually been performed by that person. Consequently, I believe it is in everyone's interest that T3 just cease from publicly discussing the merits of his approach, for his own benefit, others on this site, and especially for the privacy of whoever may have simmed the T3 Count.
Undoubtedly, T3 must have a network of AP friends and acquaintances with whom he can continue to privately discuss his approach to blackjack and its variants.
"Your honor, with all due respect: if you're going to try my case for me, I wish you wouldn't lose it."
Fictitious Boston Attorney Frank Galvin (Paul Newman - January 26, 1925 - September 26, 2008) in The Verdict, 1982, lambasting Trial Judge Hoyle (Milo Donal O'Shea - June 2, 1926 - April 2, 2013) - http://imdb.com/title/tt0084855/
Posting Permissions
-*-
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks