See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Results 1 to 13 of 62

Thread: Ohio Gamimg Law - Theory and Practice

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,504
    Blog Entries
    59


    1 out of 2 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    That is utter nonsense. Of course if you are yelling the count at the top of your lungs that would be disruptive. But, thinking is not disruptive in any dictionary. They were not silent on the subject. Card counting is NOT illegal. It is in black and white.

    You appear to be arguing for the sake of arguing, in more than one thread. That is, you are being disruptive.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    That is utter nonsense. Of course if you are yelling the count at the top of your lungs that would be disruptive. But, thinking is not disruptive in any dictionary. They were not silent on the subject. Card counting is NOT illegal. It is in black and white.

    You appear to be arguing for the sake of arguing, in more than one thread. That is, you are being disruptive.
    Glad that you are finally seeing this. Every thread. What's the point?

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    That is utter nonsense. Of course if you are yelling the count at the top of your lungs that would be disruptive. But, thinking is not disruptive in any dictionary. They were not silent on the subject. Card counting is NOT illegal. It is in black and white.
    Seeing as this entire post is a ridiculous mischaracterization and one couldn't possibly expect it to sway my mind, I'll assume its intent was to order me to 'shut up'. I do not accept your unsupported positions. have no idea why the topic wasn't allowed to end the first 3 times I closed it out if it's disruptive, and I assume I will be allowed to refute or agree with any further discussion on my personal view on the specific topic.
    Last edited by Boz; 06-17-2016 at 10:14 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. The Theory of Blackjack
    By moses in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-03-2013, 05:18 PM
  2. More Voodoo theory
    By Ikerus in forum The Disadvantage Forum
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 01-26-2013, 10:25 AM
  3. Brick: BJ theory
    By Brick in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-19-2005, 03:20 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.