I have opened "HiLo Lite Full indices" included in CVCX.
ScreenShot1.jpg
Very poor SCORE !
Do you have same results ?
I have opened "HiLo Lite Full indices" included in CVCX.
ScreenShot1.jpg
Very poor SCORE !
Do you have same results ?
Last edited by Phoebe; 01-19-2016 at 08:38 PM. Reason: My english is as poor as this SCORE :-)
Are you forcing the bets or something else? In particular, are you using Rational Bets? This severely hurts HiLo Lite because of the way it does TC calculation. Here is the correct chart:
hilolite.jpg
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
Sim from first message.
ScreenShot9.jpg
Norm's sim, maybe.
ScreenShot10.jpg
Only difference is "Rationnal bets" vs "Minimum chip size"
BTW, I will never play second.
Even if SCORE is dramatically poor in first, ramp is better. So I think SCORE is irrelevant with CVCX and divisor by half deck in TC
Last edited by Phoebe; 01-21-2016 at 12:35 PM.
Divisor by half-deck in a level I count is a bad idea. That's why the SCORE sucks with rational betting. Ages ago I talked about the compressed true-count when dividing by half-decks in a level I count. The table shows this dramatically. 9.4% of hands a TC +1. 2% of hands at TC +2. Then a TC of +3 every few hours and a TC of +4 next week.
"I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse
In HiLo Lite, you divise by half-deck but you don't use directly this TC.
As you calculate edge, you subtly reintroduce classical TC.
But I think CVVX has no edge based betting strategy !?
Last edited by Phoebe; 01-21-2016 at 12:51 PM.
Yeeeeess !
ScreenShot12.jpg
Last edited by Phoebe; 01-21-2016 at 01:27 PM.
Bookmarks