One of the smartest ?
Your sarcasm is a faux pas.
He may have been the very smartest.
I would (almost) never hit 16 vs. 10.
Even at a negative True Count, the lost equity is minuscule.
What did he "lose" on his $10 bet ? Fourteen cents ? 19 cents ?
Thus, the "cover" gained is bought ever so cheaply,
as it is mathematically correct at all "plus" T.C.'s
Thus, the clear majority of the player's funds (for this play)
will be correctly played by standing on all 16 vs. 10.
Any half-smart Pit Critter can see that ordinary poppies will play that
hand, one way or the other. Most who switch plays are strong players.
Of course, with super strong counts, e.g. Tarzan you'd have knowledge of
whether there are more 5's than 6's available for you to draw.
The R.C. can be -5 or +5 and it may or may not be correct to hit.
Bookmarks