A noobs year in review

**Stealth** · 12-30-2015, 01:08 PM

Originally Posted by blueman

If the game is good, you'll make more here than at blackjack.

Well that depends.....

If we have a large bank and TCP bet limits are constrained to low table limits which they usually are, then my blackjack play may be more productive for the team than the 4% (if no errors) TCP game.

In fact, I can find the blackjack game with a high degree of certainty and you are looking for unicorns playing TCP. Your 4% advantage is not worth anything if you can't play. And the variance in TCP is brutal.

Suggest earlier players post that identified UTH and TCP as their games, replace TCP with Mississippi Stud. Actually, I would prioritize them as MS, UTH, and a distant third TCP.

**AP360** · 01-05-2016, 08:29 AM

Mostly agree with Stealth's rating of carny games but I think too much has already been discussed on a public forum. Having said that, 3CP, with 1 card 100% and tolerant store would be my last option, if all else failed and I was away on a playing trip. The variance is indeed brutal.

**Romes** · 01-05-2016, 08:44 AM

Originally Posted by AP360

Mostly agree with Stealth's rating of carny games but I think too much has already been discussed on a public forum. Having said that, 3CP, with 1 card 100% and tolerant store would be my last option, if all else failed and I was away on a playing trip. The variance is indeed brutal.

Glad I didn't have to respond, as this is pretty much exactly what I would have said in all entirety =).