i was in a similar situation ,but i back out of it very quickily as i realized what is going on, These thing do happens but quite rare.
Don't know how accurate, but have looked up these charts for various places.
Shows a Vegas median of $15,610 without tips, and the charts sets dollar amounts for 2 sigma each way.
http://www1.salary.com/NV/Las-Vegas/...er-salary.html
fjryder,
Those figures are bogus ! Clicking around you will find that the dealers in L.V.
supposedly have a median HOURLY income of $8. Utter Nonsense.
Perhaps (?) that is what they put on their 1040's. Nope (!) Tokes are payed by check.
I have discussed this issue with dealers that I have been on the best terms with.
Of course there is a range of earnings, and $8 would be realistic for some really tiny
places with $200 limits, break-in joints, desert truck stops, etc.
Realistically, the dealers get a base salary - $7.75 per hour at MGM stores,
but typically $5 an hour is the standard. The tokes are expressed as the "toke rate."
Those vary day to day but tend to hover between $18 and $22 an hour
I estimate the average net earnings are $25 per hour. A normal middle-class existence
can be had, especially for dealers who are married / coupled with another dealer working
a different shift; although, objectively speaking, the profession itself is a miserable one.
I have a real-life friend who is a Las Vegas poker dealer and he has told me that,
depending upon where he was employed, his annual earnings were always between
$45,000 and $80,000 over the last 8 years; but poker dealers have much better jobs.
Last edited by ZenMaster_Flash; 08-21-2015 at 10:59 AM.
1. If casinos had to pay a market wage for dealers and replace all of the tips, it would not be a "modest" increase in cost. It would be at least double, if not 3-4x in many parts of the country. You can't get good blackjack dealers for a flat $10/hr. You may not be able to get the type of dealers the Wynn would want in high limit for $25/hr.
2. Casinos are very highly leveraged, and face high to insanely-high tax burdens outside of Nevada (some effective tax rates are probably over 90% of net income). So, a small change in costs results in huge changes to profitability. I stand by the numbers I posted earlier. I doubt any casino outside of Nevada or NJ could stand to deal 3:2 blackjack for less than $25 minimums, and I think 6:5 and even money would become pervasive without dealer tips subsidizing labor costs/volatility.
3. You could get warm bodies to deal for $10 an hour with benefits. To be a competent dealer, you need a high school education, an IQ north of 85, and you have to be at work on time 100% and not be high. There are a lot of places where $10 will not get you a candidate with the above characteristics. I doubt you could get good dealers for even $20/hr. flat with benefits.
The Cash Cow.
This chart shows how much casinos are paying in gross taxes in different jurisdictions:
http://www.ncsl.org/research/financi...ures-2013.aspx
Double digit taxes are levied on gross revenue (above the line). The effective tax rate (as a percentage of net income) is much, much higher for a gross receipts tax than an income tax. In addition, casinos are leveraged to the hilt with land and fixed assets. These factors combine to drastically multiply the effect of any small increase in cost.
It would seem that a table that is making $200 an hour could easily pay a dealer $20 an hour. But when you realize that 60-90% of that money is going to gross receipts taxes and overhead, you'll see how many casinos could not support those kinds of wages at low level tables in most jurisdictions.
The Cash Cow.
You need to pay for a dealer for an hour. Actually, it's 1.3 dealers per hour, since you generally have to pay for break times. You need to pay for a quarter of a floor supervisor for an hour (3/8s, with breaks). Probably at least a third of a security guard and a quarter of a surveillance operator, too. And fractions of a cage cashier, count room staff, accountants, general managers... somewhere between 2.5 and 3.5 people-hours per clock hour to keep a table open, by my rough math. Don't forget that all those employees also probably get health insurance and some other benefits.
And lights, air conditioning, mortgage, and insurance.
So, maybe, if that $200 is net, after taxes. Gross, not so much.
With a .5% HE, I get that $200 gross as $40k action. 150 rounds per hour with 4 spots in play, that's a bit over a $65 average bet per spot. That sound realistic to everyone?
On the very likely chance that I've fouled the math, I'd love to get corrected.
May the cards fall in your favor.
Dieter, this is all just examples. But blackjack players don't play basic, so the house advantage averages more like 2-4%:
http://gaming.unlv.edu/casinomath.html
Here is an article that better presents how management looks at these things. They view table games primarily through "hold" which is basically their win at a table:
http://www.casinoenterprisemanagemen...able-game-hold
The Cash Cow.
Moo321,
I tried this url with 4 different browsers. Not good.
http://www.casinoenterprisemanagemen...able-game-hold
Bookmarks