There are some quite humorous claims in that thread. KJ went into great detail in his claims that I only want new players and people pushing complex strategies on BJTF so I can sell them software. Apparently, this is behind my “agenda” of allowing discussion of DHM-like strategies, like T3’s. One problem with that logic. My software doesn’t support DHM-like strategies. Never has and likely never will. These posts they hate so much only harm me, not help me. But, they don’t violate policy – so they stay.
Second, folks keep comparing the free pages here with the paid pages there. Haven’t seen anyone compare the free pages there with the paid pages here.
Posts are cherry-picked for ridicule, like the post that asks about “playing Hooter's BJ games of all places”. That post was made by a person at an agency that hires out girls like the ones at Hooters. I left it up for humor value.
KJ also notes that the list of members that have visited in the last 24 hours has decreased, which he suggests means the board is failing. There is a very good reason it has decreased. We have switched to a CDN which has an enormous blacklist, updated constantly, and scores of rules that examine incoming traffic to exclude bots. Further, I have been banning IPs on a daily basis for a couple of months, and keep changing the registration page and questions to stop new membership bots. I’m delighted to say the number of fake members has decreased enormously. Our real traffic has increased, subscribers continue to sign up, and we are at the highest number of subscribers.
KJ actually claimed there are only one or two “real deal” players here.
Basically, these are claims based on nothing more than imagination and misunderstandings. But, I have no intention of correcting it on that site. Yes, he may be misleading people there, and that is too bad for them. But, if I respond there, it will simply start another site war. And, that is something I have fought against for over a decade.
Bookmarks