Graphical representation of 4,4 vs. 5:
https://www.card-counting.com/cvcxonlineviewer3.htm
Notice how very slowly the edge rises (almost perfectly linearly) per TC.
Don
Graphical representation of 4,4 vs. 5:
https://www.card-counting.com/cvcxonlineviewer3.htm
Notice how very slowly the edge rises (almost perfectly linearly) per TC.
Don
Ok so some people here think I'm stupid or something, so what Ima do is clarify my perfectly valid question to a player who can actually answer it.
I use zen count with a true count conversion. The games I play are either DD with H17, DAS, RSA, double any two cards, re-split up to 4 hands or 6D shoe with the same rules plus surrender allowed. Now my indices for a pair of 4's vs. 5 is to split if equal to or greater than a true count of 0 and for the 6 its a split if the true count if equal to or greater than -4. Now a pair of 4's equals 8 and if my true count is +7 or greater i would have to double against either a 5 or 6 if I wanted to play my 4's as an 8. When my true count is +7 or greater what is the best move to do if i have 4's vs 5 or 6?
thanks
Let's make this very very simple.
It is rarely worth thinking about doubling.
4-4 vs. 6 is a DOUBLE only if you have a
monster positive count.
Notes:
Doubling provides a smidgen of camouflage.
Doubling is NOT as risk-aversive as splitting.
As Tarzan has pointed out - this is a very odd hand.
Aces, side-counted are a very powerful factor
Surplus Aces favor doubling or hitting, not splitting,
especially in a S17 game.
Deficit Aces clearly work in the opposite direction.
Surplus 5's, 6's, 7's, of course, favor the split.
Read back to what I posted about only seeing a deck composition that you could double in with S17 (calling it a "Goldilocks zone") and not H17 for these two hands. With H17 there are only two choices, split or hit for 4,4vs5-6. There is no situation that you would double these hands in a H17 game, splitting in all positive counts.
Last edited by Tarzan; 05-26-2015 at 01:23 PM.
Bookmarks