See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 40 to 52 of 65

Thread: Stanford Wong & Craps

  1. #40
    Member FlightMedicNoMore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    On the Road Again
    Posts
    74


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    May I add, Norm, that there is nothing new about people buying these pie in the sky systems.
    All bleeding stops eventually.

  2. #41


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by bigplayer View Post
    No we aren't. We're not talking about "special situations". Scoblete and others are saying that dice control works on standard tables with throws that meet the rules of craps. There are always exceptions to the rule and you can't use that as a loophole to say that dice control actually works. That's like saying hole carding proves the card counting works...they are two different techniques.
    I don't care what Scoblete says. But, when bigplayer speaks I listen. You did say that half tables can be
    beaten this way. Should I ignore that?

  3. #42


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    If it wasn't for what Wong wrote on the possibility of dice control in Craps, I'd never have bothered learning Craps.

  4. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    east
    Posts
    456


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by victorino View Post
    That was pursuasive. And...I'm more skeptical again. And to answer the OP, no, Wong's work on craps does not diminish in my mind his tremendous contributions to blackjack.
    Thank you Victorino. The article poster by Richard Munchkin quoting Bryce Carlson has some solid information and the 5 year study might be the best there has ever been about the subject. There is still a strong market for the believers of the impossible. Players will be setting the die before throwing them just as they always have. The profitable rolls will be fun and surely because of their rolls. Tosses for losses will be variance. I still like SW and his BJ contributions also.

  5. #44
    Senior Member bigplayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    1,807


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    The Edge on the Come Out is so strong if you can alter the dice enough to roll fewer 7's such that you have no come-out edge you're edge on the back side would be pretty gigantic. Alternatively you could just bet the Don't Pass on the come-out instead of the Pass Line since someone who rolls fewer 7's would have a giant edge on the Don't Pass and Don't Come. If you thought you were so good you'd make your point you could just take the DOn't bet down after it establishes a point and make a fresh Don't Come Bet.

    Minor changes in the probability distribution of the dice can amount to massive swings in advantage...roll more 7's and the house gets the edge on the Pass and the Player gets the Edge on the Don't. Roll fewer 7's and the Player gets the Edge on the Pass and the House gets the Edge on the Don't. Someone who can alter the probability even a little bit can become a millionaire very quickly...if none of the Craps sharpshooters have made millions from their skill it follows that they don't have the skill the tout. How can they have the confidence to sell an expensive seminar to teach controlled shooting and yet not have the confidence to put serious money behind their throws. It just doesn't jibe.

  6. #45
    Senior Member Aslan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bethesda, MD / Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    2,808


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    No, it doesn't jibe. Those who claim DC not surprisingly keep no records proving their claim, at least, none you can trust. Even Snyder did not keep sufficient records of practice throws under ideal conditions to prove one way or the other. Every dice man has his stories, and I think those inevitable long runs probably convince them of abilities they really do not possess. I'd like to see the long-term win/loss records of so-called DC artists. I already believe I know what they would show-- something in excess of -1%. If I ever do learn DC, I will tell no one my secret, let alone teach it to the masses-- you can take that to the bank.

    Aslan 11/1/90 - 6/15/10 Stormy 1/22/95 - 8/23/10... “Life’s most urgent question is: what are you doing for others?” — Martin Luther King, Jr.

  7. #46


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Aslan View Post
    No, it doesn't jibe. Those who claim DC not surprisingly keep no records proving their claim, at least, none you can trust. Even Snyder did not keep sufficient records of practice throws under ideal conditions to prove one way or the other. Every dice man has his stories, and I think those inevitable long runs probably convince them of abilities they really do not possess. I'd like to see the long-term win/loss records of so-called DC artists. I already believe I know what they would show-- something in excess of -1%. If I ever do learn DC, I will tell no one my secret, let alone teach it to the masses-- you can take that to the bank.
    Come on Aslan, you'd teach little ol me wouldn't ya? Heck, I would keep your secret. By the way,
    who says they don't play. I thought they did but then again, if I was making 103,500 bucks in
    one weekend teaching this I could afford to play a little even if I was just a random
    thrower.

  8. #47
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,498
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    It should be noted that they give courses at and in conjunction with casinos with deals on casino room rates, etc. The casinos want these people playing on their property.

    On the Craps five-count, they claim that Dr. Don Catlin performed simulations proving the five-count will identify "hot shooters." I looked at this years back. The "sim" assumed there was such a thing as a hot shooter. Basically, it "proved" a theory that it assumed. Well, of course something is true in a theorem if you assume it is true. He simulated several shooters, some of which win and some lose. He then made a leap of logic and declared that the five-count identified the "hot shooters." Well, it definitely will identify the shooters that did well in the past. This would be valuable if you could bet on past throws. It's like asking the winner of a lottery to teach you his system.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  9. #48
    Member FlightMedicNoMore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    On the Road Again
    Posts
    74


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    It should be noted that they give courses at and in conjunction with casinos with deals on casino room rates, etc. The casinos want these people playing on their property.

    On the Craps five-count, they claim that Dr. Don Catlin performed simulations proving the five-count will identify "hot shooters." I looked at this years back. The "sim" assumed there was such a thing as a hot shooter. Basically, it "proved" a theory that it assumed. Well, of course something is true in a theorem if you assume it is true. He simulated several shooters, some of which win and some lose. He then made a leap of logic and declared that the five-count identified the "hot shooters." Well, it definitely will identify the shooters that did well in the past. This would be valuable if you could bet on past throws. It's like asking the winner of a lottery to teach you his system.
    Correct me if I am wrong but I believe the use the five count to keep from betting on on non controlled shooters.
    All bleeding stops eventually.

  10. #49
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,498
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by FlightMedicNoMore View Post
    Correct me if I am wrong but I believe the use the five count to keep from betting on on non controlled shooters.
    Yep. But, basically it assumes that if you have had good rolls, this will continue. Gambler's logic.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  11. #50
    Member FlightMedicNoMore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    On the Road Again
    Posts
    74


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    Yep. But, basically it assumes that if you have had good rolls, this will continue. Gambler's logic.
    Gambler's logic or fallacy?
    All bleeding stops eventually.

  12. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    east
    Posts
    456


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Is it legal to sell a course on a system that doesn't work? Isn't that what they do? Is it any different from selling fake goods? Just wait until they have enough graduates and the casinos get racked up. Oh yeah, the casinos give special promotions and room rates for the graduates.

  13. #52
    Member FlightMedicNoMore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    On the Road Again
    Posts
    74


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Baberuth View Post
    Is it legal to sell a course on a system that doesn't work? Isn't that what they do? Is it any different from selling fake goods? Just wait until they have enough graduates and the casinos get racked up. Oh yeah, the casinos give special promotions and room rates for the graduates.
    Legal? Yes. Ethical?
    All bleeding stops eventually.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.