Suppose your top bet is say $200 at +4 true, and you're properly bankrolled to do that. The player next to you takes out a $1000 marker and goes all in with it. He's dealt A/A vs. a 3 in a neutral count. He refuses to take another marker, and prepares to just hit his soft 12.

Now at +4 true, where you'd normally be willing to risk $200, you'd have about a +1.75% EV on the next blind hand coming up -- but -- his hand has a whopping +26% EV if you take one of his Aces!

Since Kelly advises that you bet in proportion to your advantage, are you warranted in betting 5 times your normal max when you have 15 times the advantage??