> Are you sure? :-)

> What you meant to write was, "As the count
> increases, if the dealer shows a card below 7, he is
> more likely to break," right? :-)

Of course. The dealer will actually be less likely to break with a "non-stiff" upcard showing when the count is high. That's obvious . . . isn't it?

My main point was that whether the player hits or stands, or where the player is sitting, will have no influence on the likelihood of the dealer breaking.

> Stop taking those shortcuts! :-)

The reader is expected to read what I'm thinking, not merely what I have written. :-)