Originally Posted by
VonDox
I was following Ian Anderson's green chip strategy.. On the START of the previous hand the TC had been at 3.5 and I had a $100.00 bet out and I won and parlayed up to $200.00 when the TC was 5, RC 10 with at least a 2 maybe 2-1/2 decks left in the show ( the place I play at cuts to basically 1 deck which is nice, decent penetration ) Overall for green chip play I have been very succuesful with that betting strategy and style of game play. I don't like sitting at a table longer than 2 hours, just enough to get it credited to my comps unless I win big earlier in the game where I play for practice. I then slink off to play some baccarat for awhile then come back or grab a drink and watch some football.. Then come back if I had a good first session and play again. I can't argue against what you are saying.. I do try to play strictly to basic strategy and I really know how important it is to do so. I would be kicking myself even more if I had won all 4 hands and missed out on two opportunities to double that I passed by because I had a 'bad feeling'.. I think it hurts the worst when you do misplay a hand and lose out on an opportunity to win more money than it does to simply lose that is for sure. My bankroll can take the hit and I learn and move on and I have lost more than that before playing at the $100.00 tables but that's another story.. So a question do you think Anderson's Green Chip strategy/betting-game play is wrong or ??? Would like hear any opinions on it?
Bookmarks