I need a better person at maths than me to explain the solution to the following issue.

Say you're an AP with an edge of about 0.5% to 1% and you are able to spend as much time in a casino as you wish (important point).

Say you're betting with a bankroll of $10,000 and you're playing at a $5 table using a spread of 1-10.

Say you go in to a casino and on the first shoe you find yourself up $500 by the end of the shoe. Can you prove mathematically that it's either (a) better to stop and move to another table, (b) continue or (c) it makes no difference...

My intuition says it would be best to move to another table as you've hit the table at a lucky moment in time which, if you continue is likely to re-balance and you'll gradually lose some of your winnings back given enough time or tread water until you get down to your 0.5-1.0% edge, therefore wasting your time....

If my intuition is incorrect, please provide a proof.

Any help provided would be greatly appreciated...thanks