See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Results 1 to 13 of 58

Thread: Effect of Progression on Optimal Ramp

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Effect of Progression on Optimal Ramp

    Let's say you had a 50K bank, you used an optimal ramp, and you employed no cover with a 0.1% ROR--with one important exception. If you lost a hand where you had the advantage, the following hand where you calculated you also had any advantage, you doubled your previous advantaged bet--unless the optimal bet called for more than doubling your previous advantage bet, in which case you would use the optimal bet (i.e. Martingale).

    My question is, how would this effect your ROR and hourly? Sounds like a job for Dog Hand.
    Last edited by Boz; 06-05-2016 at 06:47 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Why not use a bet progression?
    By Nogumby in forum The Disadvantage Forum
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-22-2012, 03:49 AM
  2. Progression systems
    By Norm in forum The Disadvantage Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-31-2011, 08:56 AM
  3. Jean Jacques Robert: Optimal Betting ramp
    By Jean Jacques Robert in forum Theory & Math
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-03-2005, 12:21 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.